restrain

A hymn we used to sing contained the prayer: 'Those who plan some evil, from their sin restrain.' It's hardly PC to sing it now, because evil in 2011 is not necessarily planned: it just happens, casually as part of the normality of daily life.  *I read of a large increase in the number of children 'permanently excluded' from school. Even at the age of four children check in for full time education already unable to behave in what used to be called a civilised manner. They have had no restaining influence at home, not even perhaps any kind of conversation with adults.  *A report tells of travelling families (Proper Romanies don't  behave like this) leaving sites in such a foul state, with fringe vandalism a given, that communities are outraged. Restraint? By whom? These savages have human rights, accredited by Euro legislation.  *At a whim, armies of unrestrained looters create all the havoc we are still trying to understand. We watch as police  are unempowered and under-resourced to move in to restrain them. *I am about to meet a recently-retired  nurse from an institution for mentally afflicted patients. It  is now closed, because many such patients are cared for 'in the community'.  His training included techniques for restraint, absolutely vital in cases where wild individuals were causing serious trouoble. Can we continue to allow anti-social human beings to behave without restraint? Is it  wrong to cry out in despair for wrongdoers somehow to be restrained? Or is there only one remedy... to go on singing the old hymn. and hope for the best ?

Father

Much of the response to the recent riots and looting of shops has had to do with the question of parenting. Calls for a new 'moral code' suggest that we need to return to the strictures of the Ten Commandments, and in particular the fifth, which adjures us to 'honour thy father and mother'. But it is surely unlikely, as the text then suggests that if we do so, our 'days shall be long in the land.' Why should respect for parents increase our longevity? It is considered by some that the commandment may not refer to parents at all. What if the intention was to advise people to honour 'father' as our spiritual nature and 'mother' as our physical nature? It makes a lot more sense to think that if we nurture ourselves spiritually and physically, then we are more likely to have a satisfactory and constructive, even long, life. Of course it is important to honour our parents, although there are cases in which a child would do well to avoid the example set by a brutal father. Jesus' reference to  his 'Father in Heaven' assumes a concept of father hood of the highest quality. But is Jesus referring to 'the Father' being that spiritual level of reality - the universal fundamental loving energy (God) - which seeks to penetrate and influence our temporal world?  Understood like that helps make for a betterr meaning of all references to 'Father' in the New Testament., and certainly illuminates the meaning of the fifth commandment. They don't, presumably, riot in heaven !.

junkies

The British are news junkies. Is it fear of boredom? Something needs to be going on 'out there' and the more portentous and disgraceful it is the better. We can then lock the door, hide under the blanket and revel in personal safety and innocence. We need news, even if it is only about a change in the weather - anything to up the tempo and help us to feel that life is happening. News should be 'new, true and interesting'. But can we rely on news makers, reporters and presenters to be trustworthy? Does what we read and hear comply with these three criteria? A meeting to discuss this is being held on Sunday September 4 (7.15 at the Congregational Church Newcastle under Lyme) by Progressive Christianity Stoke. There is a limit to the amount of good news we can take. News of conflicts being ended and settled is less compelling than news of conflicts starting and continuing. We feed on the exploits of baddies; Bill Sykes is much more interesting than Oliver Twist. How reliable is the media that feeds us every day? We are aghast at the way phones have been hacked to tease out privated information, but salivate at what the likes of the News of the World was able then to 'reveal exclusively'. We think we have a right to personal; privacy, but gloat over personal information about other people offered in the lurid press. How far should the media go to expose the foibles of the famous? As newspape sales decline and most people now get their news from TV and electronic gadgets will news reports become less reliable? Is society being managed on sensatuional half-truths and lies? How much anyway do we 'need' to know? It's worth discussing.

outrage

It's 6.30pm on August 8 2011. If Visigoths had been on our shores we would not feel any more vulnerable than we are.  What is happening to this land? Thugs  of all ages are destroying parts of London. Rural crime is reported to be escalating, with tractos being stolen from farms; even a church bell being stolen for scrap metal. Drain covers from the roads are being stolen for scrap. The financial markets are in continuing trouble.  There is evidence all around us of moral collapse. I hear the Home Secretary and other politicians telling us that they are 'absolutely clear' that there is no excuse for this. Hundreds will get community orders and such flimsy punishments. At the same time there is evidence of faith in the laws of God being abandoned, as people have just walked away from the groups that proclaim the Gospel of Jesus Christ and the ethical demands of other faith systems. Most of us feel utterly outraged by what we see happening. We are reluctant to cry 'To prayer, all is lost' because some of us remember the years of  the second world war,. when the destruction was much greater. But at least then we had identified the enemy. This time the enemy is our own people eating society from within. Surely a return to the practical values and disciplines of faith is now essential, There are thousands of good people of all ages around, who must make their presence felt.

redtops

How can any self-respecting person now buy the 'red top' papers aka the Sun and the Mirror? They may have reservations about the others, but these have become an offence to truth.It has always been suspected that some of their 'stories' are created from a miasma of invention and illegal prying, and there is only one way to register a protest: refuse to buy them. I became a trainee reporter with the Derby Evening Telegraph in 1948 and it was drilled into me then that  truth was sacred. Of course there are ways to present facts in such a way that they are compelling but the criteria for any news item is that it should be 'new, true and interesting'. The way Chris Jefferies was treated over the murder of a woman in Bristol was a disgrace based on speculation. The papers that pilloried this man are rightly being punished, but hardly with the severity that will prevent them from offending again. The way they work  to feed the apparent public taste for vulgarity is such that we must express disgust with them. Red tops dominate the piles of papers in newsagents' shops: a powerful indication of the sad lives that many people lead. NOTE: public meeting Sunday September 4 7.15 at PICL Palace, Congregational church car park,  Kng Street Newcastle, Staffs. 'Can we trust the media'.